ai

Stars Reach doesn’t look like you remember
June 20, 2025October 10, 2025 Game talk, Gamemaking
4 Comments

I’ve been remiss in posting updates on Stars Reach here. I mean, the Kickstarter finished back in March (late pledges still accepted)! Today, though, I want to brag about our awesome AI and proc gen driven worlds.

Over the last few releases, we have been rolling out yet another series of improvements to the look of the worlds. And we’re getting to the point where I think the alien worlds are starting to look like the covers of sci-fi novels (especially with some player help building weird structures):
Read More “Stars Reach doesn’t look like you remember”

Read More Stars Reach doesn’t look like you remember
Sandbox vs themepark
September 1, 2022September 1, 2022 Game talk
1 Comment

I just watched a couple of videos about sandbox vs themepark games (in particular one by NerdSlayer and another by Josh “Strife” Hayes)… One thing that struck me about the ways players often talk about this (because at this point the history is so old) is that people think of sandbox as the older version of MMOs, and themeparks as newer. But that’s not right – sandbox is not the older form.

Sandboxes are the evolution of themepark MMOs, not the antecedent.

Part of the reason why this isn’t clear is because most players today haven’t played what themeparks were originally, back on the text virtual worlds called MUDs that led directly to MMOs. Given that I suspect I am partly to blame for these two words having currency in the first place, I thought I’d put in my two cents.

Read More “Sandbox vs themepark”

Read More Sandbox vs themepark
New paper applies predictive processing to “what is fun?”
August 12, 2022August 12, 2022 Game talk, Writing

This paper on “Mastering uncertainty: A predictive processing account of enjoying uncertain success in video game play” is very worth a read if you are interested in the frontiers of figuring out what “fun” is. Luckily for me, it doesn’t say I’ve been on the wrong track for decades.

It does raise interesting questions given its framework — I’d love to see slot machines explained — though there is some stuff on affect that likely ties in. It also teases out some of why I have never felt comfortable with the “flow = fun” equation.

/

Another interesting intersection with other material would be motivations (a la Bartle/Quantic Foundry) and personal goal-setting. Players DO grind, after all, as they optimize, and tho the paper mentions people don’t get stuck in “popping bubble wrap,” they do for a lot longer than one would expect.
Read More “New paper applies predictive processing to “what is fun?””

Read More New paper applies predictive processing to “what is fun?”

ai

Stars Reach doesn’t look like you remember

Sandbox vs themepark

New paper applies predictive processing to “what is fun?”

Meta

Policies

Meta

Policies

Find Raph Online