Welcome to Raph Koster's personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books.

A Model of Play

April 21st, 2009

A Model of Play is a fascinating poster (available as a PDF or as images) that takes what seems like a very game-grammar point of view on the concept of play — even freeform play.

In play, one of the primary goals is to have fun — to continue engaging in the conversation that creates fun. Individuals choose the means for achieving that goal; they choose the topic of conversation, for example, which game to play. Within a topic, they choose different strategies and pursue a series of sub-goals, adjusting means according to their effectiveness. Goals and sub-goals and associated means form a tree (or web) of possibilities for action.

Among the grammar principles that are mentioned is the notion that play always requires two, even if the second person is a “virtual person.” The notion that interactivity is inherently a conversation can be traced back to at least Chris Crawford, of course.

Also cool is the “step by step” logic version found here, which builds the poster argument by argument.

*

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “A Model of Play”

Jump to reader comments » | Leave a reply »

Trackbacks & Pingbacks
    Reader Comments
    1. Michael Chui said on

      For something more concrete, they have this:

      http://www.dubberly.com/concept-maps/how-to-play-baseball-project.html

      And I’m sitting here thinking, “Look! Look! Skill chains!”

    2. Richard Bartle said on

      Hmm, it doesn’t seem to have any way to plan how you’re going to plan something, the reason being that planning and acting are considered to be separate (whereas planning is actually just like acting, but on a plan).

      Of course, given that planning about planning was the subject of my PhD, I would say that…

      Richard

    3. Morgan Ramsay said on

      The notion that interactivity is inherently a conversation can be traced back to at least Chris Crawford, of course.

      Wilbur Schramm was talking about communication as interaction in 1954. Paul Watzlawick based his work in 1967 partly on that idea, too. In 1990, Michael Motley referenced communication as interaction as well.

      Scientists treat communication as transactional nowadays, as opposed to interactional or linear. This website has diagrams for all three models.

    4. Morgan Ramsay said on

      By the way, if you want to read an interesting take on games, read Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man by Marshall McLuhan (1964). Click the link and search for the phrase “games are popular art”. Start reading from that point onward.

    Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin

    Meta

    Recent Comments

    Categories

    Tags

    Recent Trackbacks

    Archives



    A Theory of Fun
    for Game Design

    Book cover for A Theory of Fun for Game Design, by Raph Koster

    Press
    Excerpts

    Buy from Amazon

    Twitter @raphkoster



    The whole Web

    Raph's Website

    See popular posts »



    After the Flood

    After the Flood CD Cover

    Available as MP3 download
    $14.99


    More stuff to buy

    ORPG Rorschach Test T-Shirt

    ORPG Rorschach Test
    Organic Cotton T-Shirt

    $18.99


    LegendMUD

    click here to visit the Legend website

    "The world the way they thought it was..."