English flagItalian flagKorean flagChinese (Simplified) flagPortuguese flagGerman flagFrench flag
Spanish flagJapanese flagArabic flagRussian flagGreek flagDutch flagBulgarian flag
Czech flagCroat flagDanish flagFinnish flagHindi flagPolish flagRumanian flag
Swedish flagNorwegian flag     
By N2H
Welcome to Raph Koster's personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books.

A Model of Play

April 21st, 2009

A Model of Play is a fascinating poster (available as a PDF or as images) that takes what seems like a very game-grammar point of view on the concept of play — even freeform play.

In play, one of the primary goals is to have fun — to continue engaging in the conversation that creates fun. Individuals choose the means for achieving that goal; they choose the topic of conversation, for example, which game to play. Within a topic, they choose different strategies and pursue a series of sub-goals, adjusting means according to their effectiveness. Goals and sub-goals and associated means form a tree (or web) of possibilities for action.

Among the grammar principles that are mentioned is the notion that play always requires two, even if the second person is a “virtual person.” The notion that interactivity is inherently a conversation can be traced back to at least Chris Crawford, of course.

Also cool is the “step by step” logic version found here, which builds the poster argument by argument.

*

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “A Model of Play”

Jump to reader comments » | Leave a reply »

Trackbacks & Pingbacks
Reader Comments
  1. Michael Chui said on

    For something more concrete, they have this:

    http://www.dubberly.com/concept-maps/how-to-play-baseball-project.html

    And I’m sitting here thinking, “Look! Look! Skill chains!”

  2. Richard Bartle said on

    Hmm, it doesn’t seem to have any way to plan how you’re going to plan something, the reason being that planning and acting are considered to be separate (whereas planning is actually just like acting, but on a plan).

    Of course, given that planning about planning was the subject of my PhD, I would say that…

    Richard

  3. Morgan Ramsay said on

    The notion that interactivity is inherently a conversation can be traced back to at least Chris Crawford, of course.

    Wilbur Schramm was talking about communication as interaction in 1954. Paul Watzlawick based his work in 1967 partly on that idea, too. In 1990, Michael Motley referenced communication as interaction as well.

    Scientists treat communication as transactional nowadays, as opposed to interactional or linear. This website has diagrams for all three models.

  4. Morgan Ramsay said on

    By the way, if you want to read an interesting take on games, read Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man by Marshall McLuhan (1964). Click the link and search for the phrase “games are popular art”. Start reading from that point onward.

Meta

Recent Comments

Categories

Tags

Recent Trackbacks

Archives



A Theory of Fun
for Game Design

Book cover for A Theory of Fun for Game Design, by Raph Koster

Press
Excerpts

Buy from Amazon

Twitter @raphkoster


The whole Web

Raph's Website

See popular posts »
About the blog »



After the Flood

After the Flood CD Cover

Available on CD
$14.99


More stuff to buy

Mohawk Penguin T-Shirt

Mohawk Penguin
Ash Grey T-Shirt

$16.99


Receive CafePress Updates!

LegendMUD

click here to visit the Legend website

"The world the way they thought it was..."


Get Firefox