Welcome to Raph Koster's personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books.
Welcome to Raph Koster's personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books.

Fiction
Realistic fiction and a dollop of magical realism.

Genre
Science fiction and fantasy.

Live
Improvised stories told live around a virtual Halloween campfire.

Poetry
Just a few samples, from formal and free verse to limericks.

Lit crit
Essays on various literary topics.

writing and talking

a meditation on David Antin

i was supposed to write an essay     but i have hated writing essays     for some time now     though im very good at writing them     at least in the traditional     college-accepted     college-trained manner     and i have to write two other essays     so this isnt really an essay     call it a meditation     it is addressed to you     imagine a dear hank     typed at the beginning     even though im writing this little intro last     and if it gets personal     its because it has to     or else it will have no validity     as a meditation     and if its looks deceive you     well thats one of the points it tries to make

writing and talking

well     what id like to do here     is write a little about antins work     on a speech basis that is      a basis which may seem odd     or uncomfortable     particularly since im writing     not talking     but since this whole endeavor seems sort of silly     sort of self-contradictory     im not entirely sure it isnt appropriate to appropriate     his page construction and so on     i mean if i were talking a talk-poem     about talk-poems     or actually     about antins particular talk-poems     i would do it this way     right?     and what im doing is talking a talk-poem     but on paper     besides then i can do things like play     with appropriate and appropriate     or with the structure of a paper itself     so given all this     this is a paper not a poem     this is just in an odd form     a form which i hope will flatter the material     and if it doesnt at least it will     make it different     although not for the professor who gets to read it     i imagine hes getting lots     just lots     of talk-poems     but then this will be different     because its a paper     not a talk-poem     nomenclature is an odd thing     i want to think on paper     about a particular thing     the boundary between writing     and talking     and writing is of course a form of thought     as bernstein had it     although you know i disagree with bernstein     on a lot of things     almost everything     but disagreement is only natural     anyway     talking is also a form of thought     a form that doesnt lend itself to revision easily     unlike writing perhaps     as ive been typing this     ive gone back and fixed many typos     adjusted spacing on the page     and if i chose i coul dleave in a misspelled work     whoops theres one     no a few     anyway     and people would probably sit there and wonder     why thats stupid     surely he could have proofread     or spell-checked nowadays     and it leads to tangents in their thought     like why he didnt     typographical effects are a possibility     he did it on purpose     and then you can really get into picky little discussions     the kind of thing like arguing over that space in addies section in faulkner     in as i lay dying     what does the space mean     or in howes overtypes or cages scratched out stuff     what does that deletion mean     what does it imply about his philosophy     a very graduate school kind of thinking     in any case     this is all different from talking     of from talking as a form of thought     which doesn�t lend itself to well to that kind of tricks     i call them tricks not in a pejorative sense     but in a sense like that of saying     stunt acting     sort of miniature tour de forces     high risk moves that can easily     fall into absurdity     do them enough     and theyll be cliched or      precious     although a good craftsman can of course prevent that     but in any case you cant scratch out what you just said in speech     it stays there even if you say     disregard that     disregard that     members of the jury     is a typical lawyer trick in the movies     i dont know if its a trick in real life     the trial lawyer says something inflammatory     something objected to by the other lawyer     and the judge strikes it from the record     the jury is supposed to ignore it     but they cant     because theyve heard it     and it is stuck in their memories     but ah revision     between the first and second drafts     or even in a single draft like im doing now     you can remove a thought and it will be gone     the reader will never know it was there     although the writer will     and in a certain way thats all that matters     so thats a difference between thinking in speech     and thinking in writing     some are better at one     some at the other     but there are many similarities     in the ways in which we try     to convey those thoughts     in speech or writing     whether were talking a poem or writing one     and all this has been by manner of introduction     to what i want to talk about     i say talk because you can talk on paper     i want to talk about the way     in which antin uses the devices of speech     in the supposed poems     now antin doesnt claim to be doing poetry with these     at least he says so in some places     he wants to be called a philosopher     socrates keeps coming up     but he does call the works that result     talk-poems     a term i will quibble with     about which more later     i think these arent poems     but speeches     but i have my own terms     and ive quarreled with people over them     so i wont make a strong case for that now     some call poetry     language arts     but i think thats overly broad     it might have worked     in the past     but its too much now     and i classify what antin has done     as public speaking     oratory is i suppose     a more distinguished name     but since i want to talk about the way in which antin uses the traditional devices     of oratory     in what he does     it doesnt matter whether     something like     talking at the boundaries     is a poem or not     i could be talking about howes use of      techniques of visual arts     without saying that her writing is a painting     which i dont think it is     but the point is     that its beside the point     since this is an essay     or a paper     and not a discourse     i suppose i should start by defining a thesis statement     something along the lines of     antins use of rhetorical devices such as     parallellism     analogy     exposition of deductive reasoning     and reasoning from the specific to the general     contribute to the interpretation of his work as public speech     and not as poetry     but that would be needlessly argumentative     and i think not in the spirit of his work at all     so ill just start this     and see where it leads me     so like antin so often does     i think ill tell a story     but unlike antin its about myself     more than an example drawn from someone he knows     antin     ive noticed     tends to know people who serve as wonderful     examples of ideas     almost more like case studies than examples     instances     and even for instances     now when i was a senior in high school     i did oratory     in the category called by forensics people     extemp     short for extemporaneous speech     and this category is usually divided into levels     national affairs and     international affairs     the advanced people took international     i guess because there was more to know     i did international     because i have a better understanding of them     than of national affairs     my upbringing no doubt     but not because i was advanced     i wasnt     we were all new at it     it was a new program at my high school     the way it worked was that you were given a question     or three and you had to choose one     and you had half an hour to prepare     and then you spoke     a short speech     six minutes     no more no less     if you could help it     it was supposed to be not just explanatory     because the questions usually demanded more than just research     and speaking ability     they wanted you to answer the questions     like solve the problems in yugoslavia     i was asked what the solution to ethnic troubles in the region called bosnia might be     this back in 89     before it blew up     and i blew the question     not as badly as i could have     but pretty bad by my lights     because there is no six-minute solution     to bosnia     not in 89     not today     i did advise legitimizing milosevic     to defuse his rebellion     but who knows if that would have worked     you had to prepare out of files you brought with you     and being beginners at it     we had very small files     on only a few subjects     we did well despite that     we went to philadelphia for the national championships     we were wiped out in the first round     i was so nervous all i could think of was     it cost me a hundred and fifty bucks of my own money to come up here and im going to flunk out fast     why didnt i spend the 150 on something else     but before we got the nationals     i had to do my state-winning speech     and that was on afghanistan     the ussr had just retreated from there     and the war was officially over     and the speech was about the war     and about the future     and it was brought closer to me by the fact that     the niece of one of the top contenders     for the presidency     then newly created     one of the mujahedin leaders niece     was a classmate of mine in school     [name redacted]     and now she is the niece of the president     or maybe of the expresident     the troubles continued     but it was brought home to me by this     by the personal knowledge of someone who was      personally involved     and so i won the right to be on the state team     with an anecdote     about the last soldier to leave afghanistan     and i had his name     but i dont remember it     but it was a very powerful anecdote     and it brought a reality to the subject matter     a reality that my analogy about a big red bear     and a little sleeping country     just couldn�t     the analogy was a good opening     but it had no magic to it     but a personal account     a story     now theres mythmaking     and mythmaking is my term for creating a resonance     a communication that conveys a fundamental     without stating it     essentially didactic     but expressed through story     it was a good speech     i think     and i won a berth in philly     and it was a worthwhile trip     but what has stayed with me is     tell a story     an old lesson     but one that has stuck     because stories are things people relate to     they tend to jump boundaries     and thats why the anecdote      is such a fundamental part of public speech     i think antin organizes his talks around anecdotes     as a structuring principle     in the same way that his organizing principle on the page     is the phrase     i was touched by afghanistan because i knew [name redacted]     and because i was touched i knew to tell a story      that could touch people     now i have no idea if this story     has touched you     but it was intended to be an example of a rhetorical device     one that is the center of antins technique     the anecdote     and he tells rather long involved ones too     with lots of possible angles of approach     but then even simple stories have many possible approaches     i was reading william goldmans book on hollywood     the part about how to adapt material for a screenplay     and that was a major concern of his     how to present the story     a book about a family     cant be about a full family onscreen     because of time limitations     it has to center on somebody     and whats more on one problem in that somebodys life     if you do it right     the audience will feel involved     but if you cant focus     the effect will diffuse     and in a speech where there is no visual element     or at least not as involved     and involving     a visual element     anecdote and other descriptive measures     ground the listener     im reminded on the old radio serials     i know im too young     dont bother thinking it     ive heard them anyway     and i was reading stephen kings fascinating book about horror     danse macabre     and he talked about the way reader or listener involvement varied     from the old radio horror shows     to the novels he writes     and how what was totally involving in one     was stultifyingly dull in the other     i dont doubt this paper     as a speech     or read aloud     would be less involving     because it isnt full of colorful anecdotes     and it tells more than it shows     and modernist texts which present multiple or infinite perspectives     on an issue     or assume this idea of relativism     as a basis for thought     seem to me to miss this point     and fail to ground the reader     and heres a difference between a written artifact and a spoken one     im going to go eat dinner     and this could have been totally hidden to you the reader     but im telling you because i want to reinforce that point     that immediacy is a tricky thing     when you start considering writing versus talking     immediacy might be conveyed by simple tricks like anecdotes     or by attention-getters like saying     im going to dinner     and the beauty of doing it in writing     is this     i actually went to dinner yesterday     this paper got picked up over a day later     but the break is mid sentence     and could have been totally hidden     but there is a unity in speech     a unity that you cant help but deal with     of time and place     because you can only wander so far     from your listeners     and your voice can only go so long     not to mention the attention spans     of some poor fuckers     who maybe think theyre getting culture     its like a swimming pool     you can swim around     but only in the pool     theres no ocean to escape to     not if you want to keep swimming     and sooner or later youll run out of pool     or at least pool that holds your interest     and start being prunelike     and you have to get out     its the unity of time and place     classical greek drama worshipped these unities     but weve dropped them from theatre     mostly     but they remain in life     now the swimming pool is just an analogy     and its an imperfect one     but then analogies tend to be     imperfect that is     because to use a professorial term     they are asymptotic     approaching but never equalling     antin uses analogy     a typical speech device     even more typical of explanatory communication     a didactic device          relating the unknown to something familiar     in order to bring the unknown into the realm of the comprehensible     analogies work well either in speech or in poetry     a metaphor is often used     in poetry     as an analogy     and a simile is an analogy really     saying one thing is like another     perhaps when its not     but to facilitate understanding     but the difference between a speech analogy     and analogies in poetry     is that you just dont seem to get     poetic     lousy term     in speech analogies     you can in written essays     and often do     but rarely in speech     often the moment of poetry is the high point     of any speech     king saying he has a dream     and literally its a dream     but its also a metaphor for the possible future world     only comprehensible in the light of dreams     because of the harsh reality     and dont say im too young for king too     all this analogy by way of saying antin      is essentially an analogical person     in his talk-poems     and we can extend that     analogical     and analytical     exploratory in a rather didactic sense     his talk-poems are constructed rather rigidly     around anecdotes that personalize     what seems to be a very intellectual exploration     of issues that are abstruse enough     to require analogies for their explication     and explicate he does     although he asks many questions at the same time     now let me tell another story     again about me     ive been thinking a lot about modernism     not modernism the literary term per se     but modernism as in the modern life     and modern thought patterns     not necessarily modern thinking     as in discussing nietzches philosophy     but as in thinking about the broad patterns     that can be seen in life and art     and ive been putting down a lot of my thoughts     in a journal     thinking on paper     which has a tendency to make them seem more solid     better conceived     than simply saying them out loud     if we read it     it must be true     goes the old saying     in any case     i have been talking about this matter     of the general thought of the twentieth century     to many people     professors     students     in several disciplines     and uniformly the young     agree with me     and the older     disagree     and specifically     you disagree     with many of my ideas     which is fine     especially since i disagree with many of yours     but what fascinates me most i think     is this gulf between the perspectives     of older and young     and the kneejerk reactions     both sides have upon hearing the others     point of view     the young seem to think the old     well     they love modernism     because they make a living off it     and feel threatened by suggestions     that it may not really be helpful to life     in any concrete way     and maybe hide behind the idea     that nothing needs to be helpful to life     or society     and i called that selfish in my journal     and got the comment     come on     but i think its a valid observation     this is not socially engaged writing     it is self engaged writing     but this is a whole other argument     the story i want to tell has to do with the gulf in perspectives     and the kind of reasoning it implies     i could quote here     at some length     because this is written thinking     and i can pause long enough to look up something     that id like to put in the essay     so heres my quotation     whoops cant find it     its down in the car     and its two a m     im not going down there     but i can paraphrase     in my journal     you wrote     im worried about a certain closed mindedness     you wrote     and so were back to the beginning of the term     if so why are you in this class     you wrote     i suggested further research and i see no evidence of it     now these remarks     hurt when i read them     because i feel them to be unjustified     but i cite them as examples     of an antin technique     that is also a logical fallacy     but which antin uses brilliantly     to explain and convey his meaning     now you dont know and cant know     how many books i may have read on modernism this term     the answer is around twenty to thirty     and i didnt read just on poetry     i read on art     and on music     by professional critics     and by laymen     who were often more perceptive     and ive read nonfiction by modernist writers and painters and musicians and composers too     and this term ive written about forty thousand words     on modernist thought     and ive written positive and negative things     and ive argued the case for bernstein     and cage and howe     before unsympathetic people who thought it was just crap     artsy crap but crap     and because i didnt get to read antins own modernism book     i am suddenly treated like an eight year old     who isnt doing his work right     and my own thoughts suddenly have no validity     this is an example of reasoning from the specific     which was my brief little essay on bernstein     which i admit included broad sweeping statements     intentionally meant to be inflammatory     to the general     which frankly was the validity of my thought processes     my integrity as a student     and my integrity as a writer     i was enjoying the give and take     in the journal writing     but those comments soured me     they were a logical fallacy     flawed in their assumptions     a similar assumption arose from the others in the class     they saw that we had a give and take     they saw my attitudes towards what we read     only in the classroom     and one night at storyville     the last night it was open     i learned that they all thought i loved everything we had read     they were shocked to hear about the intellectual quarrels     you and i had     shocked and pleased about the quarrels     over the material     assuming     because they did not see the journal     that my in-class comments     reflected all i thought     again reasoning from a specific instance     to a generalization     now this form of reasoning works     sometimes     for some things     a classic example is saying     from a drop of water     i could reason out the existence of not just the atlantic ocean     but of ocean liners     fly fishing     and the el nino current     i think this is in conan doyle     but ive rephrased it considerably     anyway     antin does this     i think of the various anecdotes he tells     particularly the moments in his talk at the university of alabama     when he plays with the permutations of black warrior     he reasons out from a specific instance     metonymy and synecdoche are the parallel devices in poetry     again they are metaphorical     rather than analogical     at least in the sense that i use the terms     now     ive been piling up instances here     examples     and antin uses examples continually     they are intrinsic to argumentative     or didactic speech     and for all of his questions     i think antin falls into these two categories     and these examples have been supporting the case i said i wouldn't argue     that antin leans towards speech     not poetry     in these talk-poems     so ill let the essay so far stand     as my quibble with the term     talk-poems     even though i realize     my own approach     has been argumentative     but not necessarily towards that goal     sorry if this rambles     in other words     sorry if this meanders and wanders around the point     a little     but then      this is a major feature of antins work as well     his careful structure     is like a grape trellis     and his talk is the vine that weaves around his anecdotes     and his parallel structure     a structure which i wanted to mention     but which i think requires no real examples     taken from a talk-poem     originally i was going to examine a talk-poem closely     in the best grad school fashion     but take this as my own form as content     talking about a book you can and have     perfectly well read yourself     seems selfish to me     a sort of futile digging     valid in its place     which is to open the minds of people who may not have seen      certain things in it     but my telling you what i saw in it     when really these are things you have seen yourself     seems silly     thats why im not wild about citing     from antins work     or even to the extent of going down to the car     to dig up the journal     to find your exact words     because i want this essay to illuminate antin     not from within     thats his job     but from outside     to be socially engaged criticism perhaps     although i hate calling anything criticism     so my anecdotes are and have been about me     or from books i have read     and hopefully about the world at large     through my lens     because i cant portray it any other way     they are externally directed     not referring back to the text     now if you grant this     the same validity that random processes have     for cage     or that the impossibility of a single perspective has     for howe     or that collage composition has     for you     if you grant this entirely     every single paper must get an a     because they are individual reactions     to the reading     what makes one more valid than the other?     form i guess will be the criterion     well im trying to talk about form     in antins work     and im going to make a value judgement     just as you must when grading these papers     antins talk-poems are misnamed     they should be called speeches     they work better when seen as speeches     they work better when seen as philosophical inquiries     as essays even     than as poetry     and this is because we must label     we must categorize our experience     and we do it with parallel structure     with personal anecdotes     with analogies     and logic     and whatever     we are binary thinkers     analog machines are what we build     all languages go at least to two     because of our biology     we are tool makers     and we build     and if one of the things we build     is intellectual constructs     so be it     and certainly we may label     and in labeling exclude     rigidify     limit     but the alternative is no labels whatsoever     and no value judgements     but trust me     you would hate to live in a world where nothing was better     than anything else     one last story     i said that i had written free verse for years     and the comment penciled in the margin was     the word pompous     are you fifty?     sigh     here is labeling     and value judgements     and everything else     perhaps i have been writing free verse for years     two is years     although its closer to ten years     and this annoyed me     because i can imagine going to antin himself     despite the things he mentions in these talk-poems     and getting a similar reaction     i did from chris custer     i can from many people     age is no barrier     we make value judgements     i was to talk about writing and talking as forms of thinking     and this is it     im talking by example     antin is my trellis     this essay is my vine     and this is our conversation     but you have to     by the framework imposed     by university     the framework you work to maintain     contravene ideas you have set forth in class     and make a value judgement     and i      am going to let this stand     an essay not about antin     but about things that spin off antin     because things spun off [name redacted]     and because of that i saw philadelphia for the first time     this is the question you have to ask yourself     what grade does this get?     and the question i have to ask myself     because i have listened and thought hard     about the things youve mentioned     issues youve raised in class     does this grade matter?      your value judgement matter?     its just a label     a label as essentially divisive     as say the boundary between writing and talking     and my world tells me     that since it matters to me     not because i might not get a degree     ive gotten past the stage of worrying too much about things like that     since it matters to me what grade i get     labels matter     or otherwise     bosnia would be quite happy as yugoslavia     and this could have been spoken out loud to you     in a rush of words     perhaps less well-formed     but valid in my eyes     despite my age     reading     beliefs     background     past poetry writing     journal     classroom comments     preferences in reading material     and valid in your eyes     if you believe in what you say     so theres an implicit rhetorical question     im not going to revise this away     or back down from the challenge     you would never know had been there     let it stand as if it had been spoken     unretractable     because im tired of writing essays which is just me     and want to return to talking     to you     because     the beautiful thing about binary     is the implicit relationship     that theres a story in it

Child's Play


A Theory of Fun
for Game Design

Cover of A Theory of Fun

Press

Excerpts

Buy from Amazon


After the Flood

Cover for After the Flood CD

Available on CD
$14.99


More stuff to buy

Gratuitous Penguin 2006 Wall Calendar

Gratuitous Penguin 2006 Wall Calendar
$18.99


Receive CafePress Updates!

LegendMUD

click here to visit the Legend website

"The world the way they thought it was..."