Welcome to Raph Koster's personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books.

Flash on TVs and set-top boxes

January 5th, 2009

A long while ago, I blogged about Adobe’s Open Screen Project, which is a big consortium pushing Flash onto as many devices as possible. Well, here appears to be some of the first fruit of it:

Adobe® Systems Incorporated (Nasdaq:ADBE) and Intel Corporation today announced plans to collaborate on the development to port and optimize Adobe® Flash® technology for the Intel® Media Processor CE 3100. This effort is expected to provide consumers with richer and more seamless Web-based and video viewing experiences through advanced Intel-based cable set-top boxes, Blu-ray Disc players, digital TVs and retail connected AV devices….

— Intel and Adobe to Extend Flash Platform to TVs.

They go on to mention plans to ship this chip within 2009, as well as an initiative around Air. We’ll see what comes of this… Intel has to get that chip adopted, after all.

In the meantime, I also noticed over the holidays that Microsoft is beta testing a new download center that requires Silverlight — that’s a way to push plugin adoption right there…! Of course, they also push it via pop-up on Microsoft’s front page… the war continues.

*

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Flash on TVs and set-top boxes”

Jump to reader comments » | Leave a reply »

Trackbacks & Pingbacks
    Reader Comments
    1. Tony Huynh said on

      Now if they can get Flash on my iPhone I’ll be happy.

    2. James said on

      I don’t mean to start a Flash vs. Silverlight war, but does anyone else see Silverlight as a solution looking for a problem?

      Flash essentially evolved at a time when JavaScript was the (painful) norm for webpage animation and interactivity. Compared to the alternative, it was a godsend. Since then, it has become something more that works well (even if Apple insists it’s too inefficient to be run on the iPhone).

      Then Microsoft comes out of nowhere with Silverlight. On the one hand, it’s a welcome replacement for ActiveX, but so was Flash. It’s hard to see Silverlight as anything other than Microsoft trying to get in on a market that Adobe has cornered for a long time. Otherwise, it doesn’t have a compelling reason to exist.

      As a user, I resent this. Sure, Microsoft’s welcome to a piece of the pie, and competition is healthy for innovation, but competing standards are a nightmare for users. Flash video became so prominent because it was a single solution, multiplatform video codec. You didn’t have to worry about MPEG-2, MPEG-4, WMV, QT, and which player could use which codec — just use a Flash applet (and since everyone has Flash) it will just work.

      It’s even more painful because I use Linux at work and on my laptop. I haven’t heard any mention of Microsoft developing an open source Silverlight VM — is Linux going to be left out in the cold again?

      Overall, I just see this as yet another attempt by Microsoft to develop and enforce a monopoly, hurting the consumer along the way.

    3. James said on

      EDIT: I shouldn’t give Adobe so much credit. Macromedia did all of the work developing Flash and making it popular. Adobe just picked it up after the one-hit wonder went out of business.

    4. Danc said on

      There’s Moonlight, the Linux implementation of Silverlight, officially supported by Microsoft.

      Competition is a very good thing. Flash, for all the progress it has made with Flex, still doesn’t have the maturity of .NET. One of Silverlight’s opportunities is that it is very appealing for .NET developers who wouldn’t touch ActionScript with a 10-foot pole.

      The result will ideally be that A) Flash is pushed to enable the building of more robust, maintainable large scale applications and B) that the Microsoft stack will be pushed to be friendlier and more open for artists. Both of these, despite what each camp says, would be radical improvements. Such cultural shifts would happen much more slowly without direct competition.

      take care
      Danc.

    5. Raph said on
      Overall, I just see this as yet another attempt by Microsoft to develop and enforce a monopoly, hurting the consumer along the way.

      I would describe it instead as MS fighting to hold a key piece of the software market that threatens to usurp the place of operating systems to some largish degree.

    Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin

    Meta

    Recent Comments

    Categories

    Tags

    Recent Trackbacks

    Archives



    A Theory of Fun
    for Game Design

    Book cover for A Theory of Fun for Game Design, by Raph Koster

    Press
    Excerpts

    Buy from Amazon

    Twitter @raphkoster



    The whole Web

    Raph's Website

    See popular posts »



    After the Flood

    After the Flood CD Cover

    Available as MP3 download
    $14.99


    More stuff to buy

    ORPG Rorschach Test T-Shirt

    ORPG Rorschach Test
    Organic Cotton T-Shirt

    $18.99


    LegendMUD

    click here to visit the Legend website

    "The world the way they thought it was..."