<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The five biggest subscription worlds?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/</link> <description>Raph Koster&#039;s personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137542</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 01:57:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137542</guid> <description>Star Wars Galaxies could have been on that list also but the designers failed to listen to the community, did the &quot;NGE&quot; and everyone jumped ship.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Wars Galaxies could have been on that list also but the designers failed to listen to the community, did the &#8220;NGE&#8221; and everyone jumped ship.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eolirin</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137479</link> <dc:creator>Eolirin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:16:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137479</guid> <description>Well, Sir Bruce&#039;s numbers have never exactly been entirely accurate. I&#039;m not sure how much stock you can put in them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Sir Bruce&#8217;s numbers have never exactly been entirely accurate. I&#8217;m not sure how much stock you can put in them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rick</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137467</link> <dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:57:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137467</guid> <description>Eve&#039;s population has big Russian, Scandinavian, and European factions. I&#039;d suspect those three groups outweigh total US subscriptions, so yeah, I can see where US Eve subscriptions are under CoH&#039;s numbers.
I&#039;m pretty surprised EQ and EQ2 would be listed as lower than CoH, though. Sir Bruce&#039;s April charts had higher sub numbers for both of those games than for either Eve or LoTRO.
I guess it&#039;s all how you count subs. Numbers can say anything you spin &#039;em to say :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eve&#8217;s population has big Russian, Scandinavian, and European factions. I&#8217;d suspect those three groups outweigh total US subscriptions, so yeah, I can see where US Eve subscriptions are under CoH&#8217;s numbers.</p><p>I&#8217;m pretty surprised EQ and EQ2 would be listed as lower than CoH, though. Sir Bruce&#8217;s April charts had higher sub numbers for both of those games than for either Eve or LoTRO.</p><p>I guess it&#8217;s all how you count subs. Numbers can say anything you spin &#8216;em to say <img
src='http://www.raphkoster.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wolfgang Wozniak</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137435</link> <dc:creator>Wolfgang Wozniak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:59:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137435</guid> <description>Good to see FFXI up there!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see FFXI up there!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MMO Clerks &#187; The top five subscription MMOs in the US</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137410</link> <dc:creator>MMO Clerks &#187; The top five subscription MMOs in the US</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:17:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137410</guid> <description>[...] by PC gaming beyond what is reflected in retail sales.&#8221; Veteran designer Raph Koster reflects on the numbers at his personal site, noting the huge leap between the US percentage of WoW subscribers and the 136,000 users playing [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...] by PC gaming beyond what is reflected in retail sales.&#8221; Veteran designer Raph Koster reflects on the numbers at his personal site, noting the huge leap between the US percentage of WoW subscribers and the 136,000 users playing [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eolirin</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137399</link> <dc:creator>Eolirin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:27:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137399</guid> <description>Is that how they&#039;re dealing with their population figures? That would be a very odd way of reporting them, since usually you want those numbers to seem higher rather than lower.
I am aware that there are in fact two servers, but I would question that any comments about the total number of subscribers are separated like that. If they did in fact say that though, that&#039;s one thing. Can you provide a link to someone official saying that?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that how they&#8217;re dealing with their population figures? That would be a very odd way of reporting them, since usually you want those numbers to seem higher rather than lower.</p><p>I am aware that there are in fact two servers, but I would question that any comments about the total number of subscribers are separated like that. If they did in fact say that though, that&#8217;s one thing. Can you provide a link to someone official saying that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mandrill</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137397</link> <dc:creator>mandrill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:21:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137397</guid> <description>As I understand it, CCP has two different servers, one of which has 220,000 subscribers. The Asian players of EVE have their own server, I don&#039;t know the numbers for that one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, CCP has two different servers, one of which has 220,000 subscribers. The Asian players of EVE have their own server, I don&#8217;t know the numbers for that one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eolirin</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137392</link> <dc:creator>Eolirin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137392</guid> <description>... Oops, I just realized, CCP has an Asian market, and CoH doesn&#039;t. That could make the difference. The Chinese server probably has a decent chunk of that 220,000 too, which would allow European numbers to shift the US vaules below that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Oops, I just realized, CCP has an Asian market, and CoH doesn&#8217;t. That could make the difference. The Chinese server probably has a decent chunk of that 220,000 too, which would allow European numbers to shift the US vaules below that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eolirin</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137391</link> <dc:creator>Eolirin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:47:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137391</guid> <description>Raph, it&#039;s also based on a survey of customers according to the article and not official numbers from actual companies, which probably further muddles things, and worse, there&#039;s a level of self selection mentioned, which would further slant the results.
But the article says 136k users in the US &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; Europe, something that struck me as odd. If that&#039;s true, then unless those figures are heavily skewed so that there are barely any Europeans in CoH, and EVE is skewed the other way, it seems kinda strange. I think it&#039;s much more likely that the methodogy of the stats are just plain busted for the smaller end. Even the article points out that the lack of &quot;kid&quot; games on that list may be more representative of the fact that the survey respondants aren&#039;t subbing those games than the fact that the games aren&#039;t being subbed as much if not more as the ones on the list.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raph, it&#8217;s also based on a survey of customers according to the article and not official numbers from actual companies, which probably further muddles things, and worse, there&#8217;s a level of self selection mentioned, which would further slant the results.</p><p>But the article says 136k users in the US <em>and</em> Europe, something that struck me as odd. If that&#8217;s true, then unless those figures are heavily skewed so that there are barely any Europeans in CoH, and EVE is skewed the other way, it seems kinda strange. I think it&#8217;s much more likely that the methodogy of the stats are just plain busted for the smaller end. Even the article points out that the lack of &#8220;kid&#8221; games on that list may be more representative of the fact that the survey respondants aren&#8217;t subbing those games than the fact that the games aren&#8217;t being subbed as much if not more as the ones on the list.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raph</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/05/09/the-five-biggest-subscription-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-137387</link> <dc:creator>Raph</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:52:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1730#comment-137387</guid> <description>NPD only covers North America -- I bet the difference could be explained by territory.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPD only covers North America &#8212; I bet the difference could be explained by territory.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
