<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How many hot startups are VW-based?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/</link> <description>Raph Koster&#039;s personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Siddar</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/comment-page-1/#comment-137277</link> <dc:creator>Siddar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 04:27:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1720#comment-137277</guid> <description>Someone needs to remeber this in a couple years when VW stock bubble bursts. Really those numbers are crazy. Most VW are fads that will only be hot for three to five years then slowly fade away as masses move onto the next hot VW. I dont see how those VW listed are makeing profits big enough to justify those valueations.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to remeber this in a couple years when VW stock bubble bursts. Really those numbers are crazy. Most VW are fads that will only be hot for three to five years then slowly fade away as masses move onto the next hot VW. I dont see how those VW listed are makeing profits big enough to justify those valueations.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JuJutsu</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/comment-page-1/#comment-137125</link> <dc:creator>JuJutsu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1720#comment-137125</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...many of these valuations are purely hypothetical...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
My hypothetical valuation of me puts me above Habbo/Sulake</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;many of these valuations are purely hypothetical&#8230;</p></blockquote><p>My hypothetical valuation of me puts me above Habbo/Sulake</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Samu</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/comment-page-1/#comment-136990</link> <dc:creator>Samu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:13:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1720#comment-136990</guid> <description>It took me a while to understand what this post has to do with Volkswagen AG.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me a while to understand what this post has to do with Volkswagen AG.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Chui</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/comment-page-1/#comment-136976</link> <dc:creator>Michael Chui</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:44:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1720#comment-136976</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;Habbo (why it’s not listed as Sulake, I don’t know)&lt;/i&gt;
Why is Wikipedia considered a &quot;startup&quot;? That&#039;s not a company. It is nigh impossible to take these people seriously when they make a mistake like that.
And why are they putting valuations on non-profits anyways?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Habbo (why it’s not listed as Sulake, I don’t know)</i></p><p>Why is Wikipedia considered a &#8220;startup&#8221;? That&#8217;s not a company. It is nigh impossible to take these people seriously when they make a mistake like that.</p><p>And why are they putting valuations on non-profits anyways?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Virtual Worlds News</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/comment-page-1/#comment-139492</link> <dc:creator>Virtual Worlds News</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1720#comment-139492</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;virtual worlds companies with a total current valuation of 4,858,027,000. Webkinz (#7, $2 billion), Sulake (#9, 1.2 billion), Linden Lab (#11, $1.1 billion), and Stardoll (#17, $4.5 billion) are leading the way. Though,as Raph Koster points out, if you look at the metaverse as a collection of various technologies (The Metaverse Roadmap perspective), there are even more hot companies like Twitter or Meebo that are drawing interest. The valuations are just educated guesses--&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>virtual worlds companies with a total current valuation of 4,858,027,000. Webkinz (#7, $2 billion), Sulake (#9, 1.2 billion), Linden Lab (#11, $1.1 billion), and Stardoll (#17, $4.5 billion) are leading the way. Though,as Raph Koster points out, if you look at the metaverse as a collection of various technologies (The Metaverse Roadmap perspective), there are even more hot companies like Twitter or Meebo that are drawing interest. The valuations are just educated guesses&#8211;</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Techmeme</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/comment-page-1/#comment-139493</link> <dc:creator>Techmeme</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1720#comment-139493</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Discussion: STARTUP CHATTER, The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs,Raph&#039;s Websiteand Between the Lines&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>Discussion: STARTUP CHATTER, The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs,Raph&#8217;s Websiteand Between the Lines</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Virtual Worlds News</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2008/04/29/how-many-hot-startups-are-vw-based/comment-page-1/#comment-139811</link> <dc:creator>Virtual Worlds News</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/?p=1720#comment-139811</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;virtual worlds companies with a total current valuation of 4,858,027,000. Webkinz (#7, $2 billion), Sulake (#9, 1.2 billion), Linden Lab (#11, $1.1 billion), and Stardoll (#17, $4.5 billion) are leading the way. Though,as Raph Koster points out, if you look at the metaverse as a collection of various technologies (The Metaverse Roadmap perspective), there are even more hot companies like Twitter or Meebo that are drawing interest. The valuations are just educated guesses--&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>virtual worlds companies with a total current valuation of 4,858,027,000. Webkinz (#7, $2 billion), Sulake (#9, 1.2 billion), Linden Lab (#11, $1.1 billion), and Stardoll (#17, $4.5 billion) are leading the way. Though,as Raph Koster points out, if you look at the metaverse as a collection of various technologies (The Metaverse Roadmap perspective), there are even more hot companies like Twitter or Meebo that are drawing interest. The valuations are just educated guesses&#8211;</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
