<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Vivendi buys Activision to create Activision Blizzard</title> <atom:link href="http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/</link> <description>Raph Koster&#039;s personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Republished: Virtual Worlds in the News &#171; Dan&#8217;s blog</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-133871</link> <dc:creator>Republished: Virtual Worlds in the News &#171; Dan&#8217;s blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:38:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-133871</guid> <description>[...] profitable games business&#8221;, reports the BBC.  Further coverage includes Raph Koster posting his impressions on the merger,  and this factsheet on the Activision Blizzard website I found particularly informative.  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...] profitable games business&#8221;, reports the BBC.  Further coverage includes Raph Koster posting his impressions on the merger,  and this factsheet on the Activision Blizzard website I found particularly informative.  [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BlogoWogo - The Blog Network &#124; How Will Activision Blizzard Change Games Sector?</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-131048</link> <dc:creator>BlogoWogo - The Blog Network &#124; How Will Activision Blizzard Change Games Sector?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:05:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-131048</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] that EA seems to be moving towards global media concerns while Activision (ATVI) has been &#8220;doubling down on traditional gaming.&#8221; It will be interesting to see if EA starts eyeing music, TV, film, and other entertainment [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...] that EA seems to be moving towards global media concerns while Activision (ATVI) has been &ldquo;doubling down on traditional gaming.&rdquo; It will be interesting to see if EA starts eyeing music, TV, film, and other entertainment [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-130648</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 08:34:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-130648</guid> <description>The main question... what will happen to Blizzard&#039;s &quot;when they&#039;re done&quot; release schedule for games?  Will Activision pick it up, or will Blizzard be forced to abandon it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main question&#8230; what will happen to Blizzard&#8217;s &#8220;when they&#8217;re done&#8221; release schedule for games?  Will Activision pick it up, or will Blizzard be forced to abandon it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: How Will Activision Blizzard Change Games Sector? &#183; New York Articles</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-130463</link> <dc:creator>How Will Activision Blizzard Change Games Sector? &#183; New York Articles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-130463</guid> <description>[...] that EA seems to be moving towards global media concerns while Activision (ATVI) has been &#8220;doubling down on traditional gaming.&#8221; It will be interesting to see if EA starts eyeing music, TV, film, and other entertainment [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...] that EA seems to be moving towards global media concerns while Activision (ATVI) has been &#8220;doubling down on traditional gaming.&#8221; It will be interesting to see if EA starts eyeing music, TV, film, and other entertainment [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blizzard  Activision -   - -</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-130454</link> <dc:creator>Blizzard  Activision -   - -</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:54:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-130454</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...]         (,      &#8220; &#8221;,   [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: How Will Activision Blizzard Change Games Sector? - GigaOM</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-130452</link> <dc:creator>How Will Activision Blizzard Change Games Sector? - GigaOM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:17:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-130452</guid> <description>[...] that EA seems to be moving towards global media concerns while Activision (ATVI) has been &#8220;doubling down on traditional gaming.&#8221; It will be interesting to see if EA starts eyeing music, TV, film, and other entertainment [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...] that EA seems to be moving towards global media concerns while Activision (ATVI) has been &#8220;doubling down on traditional gaming.&#8221; It will be interesting to see if EA starts eyeing music, TV, film, and other entertainment [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Morgan Ramsay</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-130450</link> <dc:creator>Morgan Ramsay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:53:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-130450</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I still don’t think that means Blizzard’s already established franchises will suffer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The effects of branding are retroactive.
&lt;blockquote&gt;unless Blizzard employees have enough clout to protest against it, which they very well may&lt;/blockquote&gt;
If you&#039;re talking about clout at the negotiating table, I hope they do. But these decisions typically rest in the hands of the parent company&#039;s communications department. What usually happens is that department will insist on the wrong decisions because they sold themselves on the strange idea that brand identity guidelines and brand architecture were never to be violated.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I still don’t think that means Blizzard’s already established franchises will suffer.</p></blockquote><p>The effects of branding are retroactive.</p><blockquote><p>unless Blizzard employees have enough clout to protest against it, which they very well may</p></blockquote><p>If you&#8217;re talking about clout at the negotiating table, I hope they do. But these decisions typically rest in the hands of the parent company&#8217;s communications department. What usually happens is that department will insist on the wrong decisions because they sold themselves on the strange idea that brand identity guidelines and brand architecture were never to be violated.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael W.</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-130443</link> <dc:creator>Michael W.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:45:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-130443</guid> <description>I see what you are saying. Blizzard&#039;s name will become meaningless if the Activision side of things slaps Blizzard&#039;s name on everything (and I tend to agree that this will probably happen unless Blizzard employees have enough clout to protest against it, which they very well may)
I still don&#039;t think that means Blizzard’s already established franchises will suffer. The Legacy and prestige of Blizzard will still exist within the Diablo, Starcraft, and Warcraft names -unless of course they let Activsion start making titles using their IP’s such as: “Barbie’s Magic Space Pets: My First Zergling!”</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you are saying. Blizzard&#8217;s name will become meaningless if the Activision side of things slaps Blizzard&#8217;s name on everything (and I tend to agree that this will probably happen unless Blizzard employees have enough clout to protest against it, which they very well may)</p><p>I still don&#8217;t think that means Blizzard’s already established franchises will suffer. The Legacy and prestige of Blizzard will still exist within the Diablo, Starcraft, and Warcraft names -unless of course they let Activsion start making titles using their IP’s such as: “Barbie’s Magic Space Pets: My First Zergling!”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raph</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-130439</link> <dc:creator>Raph</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:38:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-130439</guid> <description>Steve, Michael -- the reason to worry about tarnishing of the brand is that now everything that Activision and Vivendi make will say &quot;Activision Blizzard&quot; on it. So now we have Guitar Hero III, from Activision Blizzard, and so on. Obviously, GH3 isn&#039;t going to tarnish much of anything, but it certainly dilutes the name &quot;Blizzard&quot; to mean something more than it used to. And when you add in all the licensed titles and the like that will be published by Activision Blizzard, it&#039;s potentially a serious impact to the Blizzard name. A lot depends on how they actually go about branding the publishing entity, with logos and splash screens etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, Michael &#8212; the reason to worry about tarnishing of the brand is that now everything that Activision and Vivendi make will say &#8220;Activision Blizzard&#8221; on it. So now we have Guitar Hero III, from Activision Blizzard, and so on. Obviously, GH3 isn&#8217;t going to tarnish much of anything, but it certainly dilutes the name &#8220;Blizzard&#8221; to mean something more than it used to. And when you add in all the licensed titles and the like that will be published by Activision Blizzard, it&#8217;s potentially a serious impact to the Blizzard name. A lot depends on how they actually go about branding the publishing entity, with logos and splash screens etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Erik Bethke</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/comment-page-1/#comment-130437</link> <dc:creator>Erik Bethke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:25:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/12/02/vivendi-buys-activision-to-create-activision-blizzard/#comment-130437</guid> <description>Wow that explains why Activision did not respond to EA&#039;s 20% purchases of The9 and Neowiz.
Still EA has plenty of cards in its deck to repair that revenue fall besides the Ubi purchase...
-Erik</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that explains why Activision did not respond to EA&#8217;s 20% purchases of The9 and Neowiz.</p><p>Still EA has plenty of cards in its deck to repair that revenue fall besides the Ubi purchase&#8230;</p><p>-Erik</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
