<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Analysis of the new Bragg v Linden filing</title> <atom:link href="http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/</link> <description>Raph Koster&#039;s personal website: MMOs, gaming, writing, art, music, books</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: The Forge &#183; Bragg vs. Linden - Linden Strikes Back</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-126366</link> <dc:creator>The Forge &#183; Bragg vs. Linden - Linden Strikes Back</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:28:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comment-126366</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Pingback from Raph&#8217;s Website &#187; Mihaly analyzes the new Bragg V Linden filing [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...] Pingback from Raph&#8217;s Website &raquo; Mihaly analyzes the new Bragg V Linden filing [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: raphkoster_rss: Analysis of the new Bragg v Linden filing</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-125098</link> <dc:creator>raphkoster_rss: Analysis of the new Bragg v Linden filing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 18:29:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comment-125098</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RaphsWebsite/~3/129841833/http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/Linden Lab has filed a response, and The Forge has an analysis. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...] <a
href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RaphsWebsite/~3/129841833/http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/Linden" rel="nofollow">http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RaphsWebsite/~3/129841833/http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/Linden</a> Lab has filed a response, and The Forge has an analysis. [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amaranthar</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-125090</link> <dc:creator>Amaranthar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:19:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comment-125090</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder if, once this is all said and done, Linden will come to the conclusion that reserving all legal rights to all ingame virtual land / goods / etc is really the only way to run a for-profit virtual world.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I agree. They opened the floodgates for all kinds of problems, and I don&#039;t think they can sustain their product under these circumstances. I&#039;m sure they&#039;d argue that point, but time will show how it just doesn&#039;t work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder if, once this is all said and done, Linden will come to the conclusion that reserving all legal rights to all ingame virtual land / goods / etc is really the only way to run a for-profit virtual world.</p></blockquote><p>I agree. They opened the floodgates for all kinds of problems, and I don&#8217;t think they can sustain their product under these circumstances. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d argue that point, but time will show how it just doesn&#8217;t work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-125062</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:49:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comment-125062</guid> <description>I wonder if, once this is all said and done, Linden will come to the conclusion that reserving all legal rights to all ingame virtual land / goods / etc is really the only way to run a for-profit virtual world.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if, once this is all said and done, Linden will come to the conclusion that reserving all legal rights to all ingame virtual land / goods / etc is really the only way to run a for-profit virtual world.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 한RSS</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-125024</link> <dc:creator>한RSS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comment-125024</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] to add &#8220;legal,&#8221; &#8220;RMT,&#8221; and other such tags? Sigh.        댓글달기&#160;http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comments        Monday Mailbag: WorldsInMotion, postures, games as art Raph 2007-07-03 04:07 작성 &#124; [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
style="padding:15px; border-left:1px solid #dedede; border-bottom:3px solid #CCEBF7; background-color:#fcfeff"><p>[...] to add &#8220;legal,&#8221; &#8220;RMT,&#8221; and other such tags? Sigh.        댓글달기&nbsp;<a
href="http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comments</a> Monday Mailbag: WorldsInMotion, postures, games as art Raph 2007-07-03 04:07 작성 | [...]</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amaranthar</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-125002</link> <dc:creator>Amaranthar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:23:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comment-125002</guid> <description>One thing about all this, it&#039;ll begin to define legal claims to &quot;stuffs&quot;, so we can get a handle on what&#039;s what. The ramifications might reach a long ways into RMT, taxation, etc.
I&#039;m sort of anticipating resolutions (or at least expecting the proccess to start), and sort of affraid.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing about all this, it&#8217;ll begin to define legal claims to &#8220;stuffs&#8221;, so we can get a handle on what&#8217;s what. The ramifications might reach a long ways into RMT, taxation, etc.</p><p>I&#8217;m sort of anticipating resolutions (or at least expecting the proccess to start), and sort of affraid.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adele</title><link>http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-124993</link> <dc:creator>Adele</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:23:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comment-124993</guid> <description>Interesting. I think second life probably has more RP than any other mmorpg out there. I guess that saying, “It&#039;s not denial. I&#039;m just selective about the reality I accept.” fits well in this case.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I think second life probably has more RP than any other mmorpg out there. I guess that saying, “It&#8217;s not denial. I&#8217;m just selective about the reality I accept.” fits well in this case.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
