 | Analysis of the new Bragg v Linden filingJuly 2nd, 2007 |
Linden Lab has filed a response, and The Forge has an analysis.
Am I going to need to revamp the blog categories to add “legal,” “RMT,” and other such tags? Sigh.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
Reader Comments
Interesting. I think second life probably has more RP than any other mmorpg out there. I guess that saying, “It’s not denial. I’m just selective about the reality I accept.” fits well in this case.
One thing about all this, it’ll begin to define legal claims to “stuffs”, so we can get a handle on what’s what. The ramifications might reach a long ways into RMT, taxation, etc.
I’m sort of anticipating resolutions (or at least expecting the proccess to start), and sort of affraid.
I wonder if, once this is all said and done, Linden will come to the conclusion that reserving all legal rights to all ingame virtual land / goods / etc is really the only way to run a for-profit virtual world.
I wonder if, once this is all said and done, Linden will come to the conclusion that reserving all legal rights to all ingame virtual land / goods / etc is really the only way to run a for-profit virtual world.
I agree. They opened the floodgates for all kinds of problems, and I don’t think they can sustain their product under these circumstances. I’m sure they’d argue that point, but time will show how it just doesn’t work.
Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin
Art (13)
Game talk (1764)
Gamemaking (69)
Mailbag (16)
Misc (212)
Music (116)
Open thread (22)
Reading (115)
The Sunday Poem (129)
Watching (50)
Writing (113)
All contents of this site are ©Copyright 1998- 2012 by Raphael Koster. All rights reserved.
The views expressed here are my own, and not necessarily endorsed by any former or current employer.
A Theory of Fun
for Game Design
Available as MP3 download
$14.99
Gratuitous Penguin
Wall Calendar
$16.99
"The world the way they thought it was..."
[...] to add “legal,” “RMT,” and other such tags? Sigh. 댓글달기 http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/#comments Monday Mailbag: WorldsInMotion, postures, games as art Raph 2007-07-03 04:07 작성 | [...]
[...] http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RaphsWebsite/~3/129841833/http://www.raphkoster.com/2007/07/02/mihaly-analyzes-the-new-bragg-v-linden-filing/Linden Lab has filed a response, and The Forge has an analysis. [...]
[...] Pingback from Raph’s Website » Mihaly analyzes the new Bragg V Linden filing [...]